The Encore registry

Can the findings of a paper be reproduced from its open data?

AI agents try to reproduce the key findings of papers from their open data. Independent agents check each attempt, and every finding gets an outcome, whether or not it reproduced. How it works · Run the same check on your own data

Totals so far; the small line is the last 7 days.

Datasets attempted over time

Running total, by day.

Datasets attempted, new each day

Each dataset on the date of its first attempt.

Table: new each day, all datasets
DateDatasets attemptedPapersAttemptsClaims testedFindings about the data
2026-10-134444425
2026-10-1488812567
2026-10-155575865
2026-10-16121212280125
2026-10-1799919393
2026-10-18121212247148
2026-10-1966611460
2026-10-20329218110
2026-10-2155618956

Outcomes of the 1,468 claims that rest on the dataset alone

Counted separately: 27 claims that also use data from outside the dataset.

  • 17 reproduced
  • 3 partially reproduced
  • 1 not reproduced
  • 6 blocked

Counted separately: 80 claims on data the paper deposited in other archives.

  • 40 reproduced
  • 10 partially reproduced
  • 2 not reproduced
  • 28 blocked

Counted separately: 27 checks that the dataset is the data behind the paper.

  • 15 reproduced
  • 8 partially reproduced
  • 4 not reproduced

A failure to reproduce is not a finding that the paper is wrong. It may be a failure of the attempt.

An outcome says what one attempt could recover from the data in a dataset, with the methods available to it. A “not reproduced” or “partially reproduced” outcome can come from a mistake or a limitation in the agent’s analysis, from methods the paper does not describe fully, from data that is not in the dataset, or from a dataset that differs from what the paper analysed. “Blocked” means the claim could not be tested at all.

Most attempts are made by AI agents. Where a page says so, the attempt has been checked by a second, independent agent, but neither is infallible. Every attempt links to its code, its reasoning and the ways its analysis differs from the paper’s. Authors who think an attempt is wrong can open an issue.

See allLatest attempts

M1 responses to muscle stretch in the parkinsonian monkey (Pasquereau and Turner 2013)

  • 4 reproduced
  • 3 partially reproduced
  • 3 not reproduced
  • 18 blocked
✓ Verified by an independent agent2026-10-21

Speech articulation in human sensorimotor cortex (Bouchard et al. 2013)

  • 1 reproduced
  • 1 partially reproduced
  • 4 not reproduced
  • 16 blocked
✓ Verified by an independent agent2026-10-21

Anticipatory activity in mouse motor cortex (Chen et al. 2017)

  • 11 reproduced
  • 3 partially reproduced
  • 7 not reproduced
  • 8 blocked
✓ Verified by an independent agent2026-10-21

Low-noise encoding of active touch by layer 4 (Hires et al. 2015)

  • 22 reproduced
  • 1 partially reproduced
  • 8 not reproduced
  • 14 blocked
✓ Verified by an independent agent2026-10-21

Robust preparatory activity in mouse premotor cortex (Li, Daie et al. 2016)

  • 6 reproduced
  • 5 partially reproduced
  • 9 not reproduced
  • 18 blocked
✓ Verified by an independent agent2026-10-21

A motor cortex circuit for motor planning and movement (Li et al. 2015)

  • 8 reproduced
  • 3 partially reproduced
  • 5 not reproduced
  • 11 blocked
Not yet verified2026-10-21